sinds

docs/report/tex/report3.tex

@@ -90,9 +90,21 @@ To evaluate if the cluterings are similar to the premade clusterings of the temp
 		
 		\bottomrule
 	\end{tabular}
+\label{simtab}
+\caption{The table shows the similarity scores between the model clusters and the target clusters}
 \end{table} \noindent
-
-
+To see if the Hierachical clustering is similar to the Gaussian mixture model the same similarity measures are calculated for these two clusters. The similarity score of the Hierachical clusters and GMM clusters measured as:
+\begin{align*}
+\mathrm{Rand \ Index}: \quad 0.7241 \\
+\mathrm{Jaccard}: \quad 0.1460 \\
+\mathrm{NMI}: \quad 0.2302
+\end{align*}
+This suggest that the clusters of the GMM and Hierachical models are mutually more similar than they are to the target clusters. Overall the similarity scores seen in table \eqref{simtab} shows that the models found does not describe the target clustering of tempo very well. This does not imply that the GMM and Hierchical clustering models does not cluster the data well, but rather that clustering tempo does not explain the data well. 
+
+%Celebratory behavior is therefore more applicable to monkeys than human robots.
+%RAND BOI:0.7241369982135971
+%Jaccard_boi: 0.1460234998195718
+%NMI: 0.23017110206217814
 
 \section{Outlier Detection/Anomaly Detection}